From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luco v. Commercial Bank of San Diego

Supreme Court of California
Oct 14, 1885
2 Cal. Unrep. 549 (Cal. 1885)

Opinion

         Department 2. Appeal from superior court, San Diego county.

         COUNSEL

          A. B. Hotchkiss, for appellant.

          Levi Chase, W. J. Hunsciker and Thomas J. Arnold, for respondent.


          OPINION

         [2 Cal.Unrep. 550] THE COURT.

          A motion is made to dismiss the appeal, which is from an interlocutory decree in partition, on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served on all of the adverse parties. As the notice was not so served, the motion must be granted. Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Luco v. Commercial Bank of San Diego

Supreme Court of California
Oct 14, 1885
2 Cal. Unrep. 549 (Cal. 1885)
Case details for

Luco v. Commercial Bank of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:LUCO v. COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAN DIEGO.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 14, 1885

Citations

2 Cal. Unrep. 549 (Cal. 1885)
2 Cal. Unrep. 549