From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luckett v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 9, 2016
3:16-cv-00943-SU (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2016)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00943-SU

08-09-2016

ALVIN LUCKETT Plaintiff, v. PAM WRIGHT, Defendant.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (#5) on July 13, 2016, in which she recommends this Court deny Plaintiff's Motion (#2) for Writ of Replevin and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation (#5). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#2) for Writ of Replevin and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice. The Court further certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 9th day of August, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Luckett v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 9, 2016
3:16-cv-00943-SU (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Luckett v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN LUCKETT Plaintiff, v. PAM WRIGHT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 9, 2016

Citations

3:16-cv-00943-SU (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2016)