From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucio v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
No. C 08-0631 WHA (PR) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No. C 08-0631 WHA (PR)

07-02-2012

VICTOR LUCIO, Plaintiff, v. J.A. SMITH, an individual, et al. Defendants.

DAVID R. JOHANSON, ESQ. (Bar No. 164141) JACKSON LEWIS LLP Attorney for Plaintiff, Victor Lucio


DAVID R. JOHANSON, ESQ. (Bar No. 164141)

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

Attorney for Plaintiff, Victor Lucio

Hon. William Alsup


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Victor Lucio ("Plaintiff") received the Order Setting Motion Hearing (Docket Number 78) on June 13, 2012. The Honorable Judge William Alsup set the Hearing for Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint at 8:00 a.m. on August 9, 2012. Plaintiff's lead trial counsel, David R. Johanson (the undersigned), is out of the state on that day, and the surrounding days, conducting and defending previously scheduled depositions and is unable to appear at the Hearing on that date. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff respectfully requests, that the Hearing be rescheduled for August 16th, August 23rd, or August 30th. This Court granted the following time modifications in this case: Defendants' Request for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion (Dkt. No. 20), Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendants1 Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25), and Plaintiffs First Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. No. 42). Plaintiff also has a pending request to continue the Settlement Conference to another date in August. Plaintiff conferred with counsel for Defendants that the above-mentioned dates are available for them as well. The requested time modification should not affect the schedule of the case as it is not a large time frame and does not affect other case deadlines.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

By: _________________________

David R. Johnson

Attorney for Plaintiff

By: _________________________

Matthew M. Grigg

Attorney for Defendants

[Proposed] Order

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT THE HEARING FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BE HELD ON August 23, 2012.

By: _________________________

Honorable William Alsup


Summaries of

Lucio v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
No. C 08-0631 WHA (PR) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Lucio v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR LUCIO, Plaintiff, v. J.A. SMITH, an individual, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

No. C 08-0631 WHA (PR) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)