From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucey v. Krishnamoorthy

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jun 6, 2018
255 So. 3d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2D17–4935

06-06-2018

Sean LUCEY and Lucey Corp., Appellants, v. Deepak KRISHNAMOORTHY, Abdul Hafiz Hyath Mohammed, Gopi Chandran, Hema Chandran, Rachna Birla, Vignesh Birla, Raj Kamalnathan, and Venkata Jakkula, Appellees.

Kathleen S. Lucey of Law Office of Kathleen S. Lucey, Saint Petersburg, for Appellants William J. Schifino, and John A. Schifino of Burr & Forman, LLP, Tampa, for Appellees


Kathleen S. Lucey of Law Office of Kathleen S. Lucey, Saint Petersburg, for Appellants

William J. Schifino, and John A. Schifino of Burr & Forman, LLP, Tampa, for Appellees

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BLACK and ATKINSON, JJ., and CASE, JAMES, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Concur.


Summaries of

Lucey v. Krishnamoorthy

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jun 6, 2018
255 So. 3d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Lucey v. Krishnamoorthy

Case Details

Full title:SEAN LUCEY and LUCEY CORP, Appellants, v. DEEPAK KRISHNAMOORTHY, ABDUL…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 6, 2018

Citations

255 So. 3d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)