From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucero v. State

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 13, 1998
No. 97-A-0085 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 13, 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-A-0085.

Release March 13, 1998.

Appeal from Ashtabula County.

Petition dismissed. See Per Curiam Opinion and Judgment Entry. (FORD) (CHRISTLEY) (O'NEILL)


EXTRAORDINARY WRITS:

A writ of habeas corpus will not issue where the petition does not allege that the petitioner is presently incarcerated.

Where the petitioner has failed to name the proper party as the respondent in the petition, dismissal of the action is warranted on the basis that the petitioner has failed to satisfy the requirements of R.C. 2725.04(B). In most cases, the proper respondent in a habeas corpus action is the jailor or warden of the penitentiary.


Summaries of

Lucero v. State

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 13, 1998
No. 97-A-0085 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 13, 1998)
Case details for

Lucero v. State

Case Details

Full title:TWILA A. LUCERO, Petitioner v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

No. 97-A-0085 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 13, 1998)

Citing Cases

Tate v. Bernard

In interpreting this statute, this court has concluded that the writ will lie only against the individual who…

State ex rel. Woodley v. State

The proper party in a petition for habeas corpus is the jailer or warden who presently has legal custody of…