From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucero v. Patterson

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 7, 1972
456 F.2d 686 (10th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1133.

April 7, 1972.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., John P. Moore, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Aurel M. Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Charles T. Flett, Arvada, Colo., for appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; Olin Hatfield Chilson, Judge.

Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and DOYLE, Circuit Judges.


Upon initial screening this case was assigned to the summary calendar and notice was sent to the appellant. In addition, the appellee thereafter filed a motion to affirm which has been opposed by Lucero's attorney in a memorandum addressing the underlying merits. Nevertheless, we have now carefully and thoroughly reviewed the files and records in this case and are convinced that the judgment of the district court is correct.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court, reported at 335 F. Supp. 93 (D.C. Colo. 1971).


Summaries of

Lucero v. Patterson

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 7, 1972
456 F.2d 686 (10th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Lucero v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:FRANK B. LUCERO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WAYNE K. PATTERSON, WARDEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Apr 7, 1972

Citations

456 F.2d 686 (10th Cir. 1972)