From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucero v. Guzman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 5, 2022
2:21-cv-00915-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00915-RFB-VCF

12-05-2022

DANIEL LUCERO, Plaintiff, v. ISABEL GUZMAN, ADMINISTRATOR SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney Allison C. Reppond ALLISON REPPOND Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States BLACK & WADHAMS Rusty Graf RUSTY GRAF, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs


JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney Allison C. Reppond ALLISON REPPOND Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States

BLACK & WADHAMS Rusty Graf RUSTY GRAF, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 28, 2022, Defendants Isabella Guzman and the Small Business Administration filed their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 40). Plaintiff Daniel Lucero's response was initially due on November 14, 2022. On November 14, 2022, Defendants agreed to a stipulation allowing Plaintiff two additional weeks to complete and file his response. ECF No. 42. The Court granted the parties' stipulation on November 15, 2022, extending Plaintiff's deadline to file his response to November 28, 2022. Defendants' Reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss is currently due December 5, 2022. Plaintiff has agreed to extend the time for Defendant's Reply by one week.

This Stipulation is submitted in good faith and is not interposed for purposes of delay. This is the first request to extend the deadline for filing Defendants' Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss. Due to unexpected circumstances, including a series of scheduling conflicts and delays associated with the recent holiday, with this Court's approval, the parties hereby agree that the deadline for Defendant to file the above- mentioned Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment by one week, or such other time as deemed appropriate by the Court. With a one-week extension, Defendants' Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss will be due on December 12, 2022.

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties hereto, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Stipulation to Extend hereinabove is hereby Granted.


Summaries of

Lucero v. Guzman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 5, 2022
2:21-cv-00915-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Lucero v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LUCERO, Plaintiff, v. ISABEL GUZMAN, ADMINISTRATOR SMALL BUSINESS…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00915-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2022)