From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucero v. Blaney

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 15, 2024
24-cv-02865-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-02865-WHO (PR)

11-15-2024

ALBERT BENJAMIN LUCERO JR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN C. BLANEY, M.D., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Albert Benjamin Lucero has not filed an amended complaint by the deadline set by the Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins. (Dkt. No. 7 at 5.) Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with the prior Order and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Lucero may move to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) contain a complaint on this Court's form.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lucero v. Blaney

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 15, 2024
24-cv-02865-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Lucero v. Blaney

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT BENJAMIN LUCERO JR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN C. BLANEY, M.D., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2024

Citations

24-cv-02865-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2024)