From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucero v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 14, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02960-AP (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02960-AP

02-14-2013

ROSS LUCERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

For Plaintiff: Christopher R. Alger McDivitt Law Firm For Defendant: Alexess D. Rea Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff: Christopher R. Alger

McDivitt Law Firm
For Defendant: Alexess D. Rea

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 11, 2012
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 13, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 18, 2013

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The record is complete and accurate. The parties reserve the right to correct the record in the event it proves to be incomplete.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate the need for additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSESOTHER MATTERS This case raises no unusual claims or defenses. 7. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 29, 2013
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: April 28, 2013
C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief Due: May 13, 2013

8. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

The parties do not request oral argument. 9. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge.

10. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C. COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT. ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
APPROVED: ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF: ____________________
Christopher R. Alger
McDivitt Law Firm
1401 17th Street, Suite 300
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 426-4878
calger@mcdivittlaw.com
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY: ____________________
Alexess D. Rea
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-7101
Alexess.rea@ssa.gov


Summaries of

Lucero v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 14, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02960-AP (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Lucero v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROSS LUCERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02960-AP (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2013)