From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucchese v. Agro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 30, 1984
103 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

July 30, 1984

In an action to enforce two oral agreements, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), dated September 22, 1983, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to its original determination which dismissed the complaint.


¶ Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

¶ The oral agreements sought to be enforced here could not be performed within the lifetime of the parties' mother and are therefore unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds (see General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd a, par 1; Meltzer v. Koenigsberg, 302 N.Y. 523). Lazer, J.P., Mangano, O'Connor, and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lucchese v. Agro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 30, 1984
103 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Lucchese v. Agro

Case Details

Full title:PHYLIS LUCCHESE, Appellant, v. THOMAS H. AGRO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 30, 1984

Citations

103 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Yedvarb v. Yedvarb

There were no witnesses to this oral agreement. It is apparent that the alleged oral promise, by its terms,…

Matter of Kittay

When so viewed, it is apparent that the alleged agreement, by its terms, was not capable of performance…