From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucas v. Nieto

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 13, 2024
23-cv-04142-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-04142-JD

03-13-2024

WILLIAM MICHAEL LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. TINA NIETO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a former detainee filed a civil rights action. Court mail that the Clerk sent to plaintiff at his last known addresses has been returned as undeliverable because plaintiff is no longer in custody. Plaintiff has not provided a current mailing address.

More than sixty days have passed since the mail was returned. This case is dismissed without prejudice. See Local R. 3-11(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lucas v. Nieto

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 13, 2024
23-cv-04142-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Lucas v. Nieto

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MICHAEL LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. TINA NIETO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

23-cv-04142-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)