Opinion
WCB 85-08631; CA A45786
Argued and submitted May 11, 1988
Remanded for reconsideration June 15, 1988
Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.
James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon Moore, Eugene.
Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Graber, Judge, and Riggs, Judge Pro Tempore.
PER CURIAM
Remanded for reconsideration.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that affirmed the referee and upheld the denial of his aggravation claim for a back condition. We review for substantial evidence. ORS 656.298 (6); ORS 183.482 (7) and (8). Because neither the Board order nor the referee's opinion and order which it affirmed are adequate for judicial review, see Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or. App. 200, 752 P.2d 312 (1988), we remand to the Board for reconsideration. On remand, the Board also should reconsider this case in the light of Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or. 345, 745 P.2d 775 (1987), on remand 91 Or. App. 84, 754 P.2d 586 (1988), and International Paper Co. v. Turner, 304 Or. 354, 745 P.2d 780 (1987), on remand 91 Or. App. 91, 754 P.2d 589 (1988).
Remanded for reconsideration.