From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lubrano v. Macauley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 27, 1961
125 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 1935.

January 6, 1961. Rehearing Denied January 27, 1961.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Harry N. Sandler, J.

Thomas Alexander and Edward J. Kohrs (of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly), Tampa, for appellants.

Thomas C. MacDonald, Jr., and Thomas P. Evans (of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans), Tampa, for appellees.


The appellants were plaintiffs below and brought ejectment against the defendants, and the case was tried without jury before the trial court. The trial judge found that the plaintiffs had established a valid record title, subject to defeasance only by the defendants proving adverse possession. The court further found that the defendants had proved adverse possession and were entitled to their respective portions of a thirty foot strip of land, which was the subject of litigation. The questions presented were whether or not the evidence supported, first, the establishment of adverse possession, and second, the establishment of a boundary by acquiescence.

If the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom support the verdict and the judgment of the trial court, the same will not be disturbed on appeal. An examination of the testimony and exhibits in evidence discloses not only that the trial court could have found the verdict reached, but should have so found. Not only have the defendants and their predecessors in title established adverse possession for the statutory period of seven years to the contested lands, but the evidence also discloses that a boundary by acquiescence has been established. F.S.A. § 95.16.

Finding no error in the verdict and judgment of the trial court, the same are affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C.J., and SHANNON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Lubrano v. Macauley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 27, 1961
125 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

Lubrano v. Macauley

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO LUBRANO AND AMPARA LUBRANO, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. R.J. MACAULEY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 27, 1961

Citations

125 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

Citing Cases

Mid-States Insurance Company v. Alday

Hilton v. Northern Central Trust Co. of Philadelphia, Pa., 1934, 114 Fla. 796, 154 So. 328. A trial Judge has…

Mason v. Martino

An appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court when there is sufficient…