From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LUBELL v. WORK WEAR CORPORATION

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 16, 1976
86 Misc. 2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)

Opinion

January 16, 1976

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, CHARLES H. COHEN, J.

Monasch Chazen Stream (Arnold C. Stream and Robert G. Smith of counsel), for appellant.

Ronald Forster and Martin R. Nat for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Defendant's attorney did not demonstrate that he was a person with sufficient knowledge of the facts to respond to the interrogatories (CPLR 3134, subd [a]).

Furthermore, the court's imposition of costs did not constitute an abuse of discretion (CPLR 8106).

Concur: GROAT, P.J., SCHWARTZWALD and O'CONNOR, JJ.


Summaries of

LUBELL v. WORK WEAR CORPORATION

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 16, 1976
86 Misc. 2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)
Case details for

LUBELL v. WORK WEAR CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LUBELL, Respondent, v. WORK WEAR CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1976

Citations

86 Misc. 2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)
384 N.Y.S.2d 993