Opinion
Civil Action No. 02-cv-02158-MSK-PAC
12-16-2013
QUETZELINA LUBE, Plaintiff, v. NCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, Defendant.
Honorable Marcia S. Krieger
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff Quetzelina Lube's Motion for Reconsideration (#68) of the Court's Order dismissing her case.
On August 4, 2004, the Court dismissed (#54) this action based on the Plaintiff's failure to pay sanctions imposed by the Court. The Plaintiff sought reconsideration of that Order on October 12, 2004 (#55, 56), but the Court denied that request on November 10, 2004 (#61). More than two years after that denial, the Plaintiff again moved for reconsideration (#62). That motion was denied on August 1, 2007 (#65).
Now, over nine years since this case was dismissed, the Plaintiff has filed a third successive motion for reconsideration. Even construing the motion liberally in light of the Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court finds that she has not raised any facts or law warranting reconsideration of the Court's prior rulings. Accordingly, the Motion for Reconsideration (#68) is DENIED.
No further filings will be accepted in this case.
BY THE COURT:
_______________
Marcia S. Krieger
Chief United States District Judge