From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LU v. CHERTOFF

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 18, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0759 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0759 MCE DAD PS.

August 18, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On July 26, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 26, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss on the grounds that the action is moot is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

LU v. CHERTOFF

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 18, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0759 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2006)
Case details for

LU v. CHERTOFF

Case Details

Full title:YIFAN LU, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 18, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0759 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2006)