From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Miller Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 29, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-01557 (D.D.C. Jul. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Case: 1:16-cv-01557

07-29-2016

LT. G. COLNEL L. McD. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. MILLER COUNTY, Defendant.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 8/2/2016
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil (F Deck) MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) ("[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact."). Having reviewed the complaint, the Court concludes that what factual contentions are identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible. Furthermore, the allegations of the complaint "constitute the sort of patently insubstantial claims" that deprive the Court of subject matter jurisdiction. Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009). Therefore, the Court will grant the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: 7/29/16

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Turner v. Miller Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 29, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-01557 (D.D.C. Jul. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Turner v. Miller Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:LT. G. COLNEL L. McD. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. MILLER COUNTY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jul 29, 2016

Citations

Case: 1:16-cv-01557 (D.D.C. Jul. 29, 2016)