From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lozano v. Datereybru Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 18, 2022
6:19-cv-1783-CEM-LHP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2022)

Opinion

6:19-cv-1783-CEM-LHP

07-18-2022

DOMINGO LOZANO, Plaintiff, v. DATEREYBRU COMPANY, LLC and LAERCIO L. DE OLIVEIRA, Defendants.


ORDER

CARLOS E. MENDOZA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Third Renewed Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Datereybru Company, LLC (Doc. 66). The United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 67), recommending that the Motion be granted in part and denied in part.

After review in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition is accepted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 67) is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order.

2. Plaintiff's Third Renewed Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Datereybru Company, LLC (Doc. 66) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

a. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Datereybru Company, LLC, jointly and severally with Defendant Laercio L. De Oliveira, in the amount of $45,475.00 plus post-judgment interest.

b. The Motion is otherwise DENIED.

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lozano v. Datereybru Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 18, 2022
6:19-cv-1783-CEM-LHP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Lozano v. Datereybru Co.

Case Details

Full title:DOMINGO LOZANO, Plaintiff, v. DATEREYBRU COMPANY, LLC and LAERCIO L. DE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jul 18, 2022

Citations

6:19-cv-1783-CEM-LHP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2022)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. K&D Framing & Drywall Corp.

First, Plaintiff factors in thirty (30) overtime hours in his minimum wage calculation, which is improper…

Abdalla v. King's Food Spot Inc.

While the Motion fails to address counsel's credential or experience, the Court finds that the hourly rate is…