From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loyd v. Marable

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 19, 2022
CIVIL 20-13099 (E.D. Mich. May. 19, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 20-13099

05-19-2022

Ca'Ron Elestrious-Gend Loyd, Plaintiff, v. Herman Marable, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING 4/18/22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT DRIGGETT'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Sean F. Cox, United States District Court Judge

Plaintiff, an incarcerated person, filed this pro se action asserting claims against a litany of Defendants, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon screening of the complaint, Plaintiff's claims were dismissed against all but two defendants, Burton Police Officer Jeremy Driggett and state district judge Herman Marable, Jr.. (See ECF No. 6). The matter was then referred to the magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. (ECF No. 10).

At this juncture, Driggett is the only remaining Defendant. On April 18, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 44) (“the R&R”) wherein she recommends that the Court grant Defendant Driggett's summary judgment motion and dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Driggett with prejudice.

The time permitted for the parties to file objections to that Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the April 18, 2022 Report and Recommendation. The Court ORDERS that Defendant Driggett's summary judgment motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Driggett are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Loyd v. Marable

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 19, 2022
CIVIL 20-13099 (E.D. Mich. May. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Loyd v. Marable

Case Details

Full title:Ca'Ron Elestrious-Gend Loyd, Plaintiff, v. Herman Marable, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 19, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 20-13099 (E.D. Mich. May. 19, 2022)