From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Ltd.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 30, 2016
499 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151600. COA No. 319199.

03-30-2016

Chance LOWERY, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. ENBRIDGE ENERGY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Enbridge Energy Partners LP, Defendants–Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff in this toxic tort case sufficiently established causation to avoid summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10); and (2) whether the plaintiff was required to present expert witness testimony regarding general and specific causation. See Genna v. Jackson, 286 Mich.App. 413, 781 N.W.2d 124 (2009).

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Ltd.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 30, 2016
499 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:Chance LOWERY, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. ENBRIDGE ENERGY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2016)
876 N.W.2d 567

Citing Cases

Powell-Murphy v. Revitalizing Auto Cmtys. Envtl. Response Tr.

Our Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to consider whether the plaintiff had sufficiently established…

Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Ltd. P'ship

This Court granted leave to appeal to consider: (a) the role of expert testimony in toxic tort cases; (b) the…