Lowell v. Belsky

Full title: SEYMOUR LOWELL, Appellant, v. ROBERT BELSKY et al., Respondents

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1985

109 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 4, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.).

Order affirmed, with costs.

Special Term was correct in deciding that under the broad arbitration provision in the shareholder's agreement, the matters raised in plaintiff's complaint, viz., the attendance and performance of defendant directors Robert Belsky and Herbert Herling, were properly the subject of arbitration ( see, Matter of Freedman [ Padover], 75 A.D.2d 807, appeal denied in part and dismissed in part 50 N.Y.2d 803, appeal denied 50 N.Y.2d 926). Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.