Lowe v. Vadlamudi

Full title: DONALD LOWE, Plaintiff, v. SEETHA VADLAMUDI, ELIZABETH TATE, RUTH INGRAM…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2008

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-CV-10269-DT (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-CV-10269-DT.

October 2, 2008

ORDER

MONA MAJZOUB, Magistrate Judge

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his Response to Defendant Correctional Medical Services' Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment. (Docket no. 45). Plaintiff wishes to add exhibits X, Y, and Z to his Response. Defendants have not responded to Plaintiff's Motion. All pretrial matters have been referred to the undersigned for action. (Docket no. 8). The Court dispenses with oral argument pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e). This matter is ready for ruling.

The Court finds good cause to grant this unopposed motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (docket no. 45) is GRANTED.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), the parties have a period of ten days from the date of this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).