From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Sep 30, 2009
1:09CV595, 1:07CR71-2 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

1:09CV595, 1:07CR71-2.

September 30, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner in this action previously submitted a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. That motion was deficient, but it was filed and stayed to give Petitioner time to remedy the deficiencies. He has now filed an amended motion which is sufficient. Therefore, in accordance with Rule 4(b), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, the United States Attorney is directed to file a response to Petitioner's amended motion within sixty (60) days from the date of the entry of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lowe v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Sep 30, 2009
1:09CV595, 1:07CR71-2 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Lowe v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ROY ANTRON LOWE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

Citations

1:09CV595, 1:07CR71-2 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 30, 2009)