Opinion
No. 69145
12-17-2015
cc: Lamalsikou Lowe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges a judicial conflict of interest, improper conduct by his previous appointed counsel, failure to produce Brady materials, various errors regarding a material witness, and other constitutional violations. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34. --------
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Lamalsikou Lowe
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk