From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 17, 2015
No. 69145 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 69145

12-17-2015

LAMALSIKOU LOWE, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

cc: Lamalsikou Lowe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges a judicial conflict of interest, improper conduct by his previous appointed counsel, failure to produce Brady materials, various errors regarding a material witness, and other constitutional violations. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34. --------

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Lamalsikou Lowe

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Lowe v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 17, 2015
No. 69145 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Lowe v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAMALSIKOU LOWE, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 17, 2015

Citations

No. 69145 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)