From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Camacho

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1995
661 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2864.

October 25, 1995.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County; Alex E. Ferrer and Arthur I. Snyder, Judges.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Fleur J. Lobree, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before HUBBART and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


Based on the authority of State v. Robinson, 571 So.2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) and State v. Perez, 524 So.2d 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), we reverse the trial court order under review dismissing the information below on the sole ground that the defendant passed a polygraph examination in the case. The law is clear that such a dismissal is invalid and is subject to reversal on appeal where, as here, the state objects in the trial court to the giving of the polygraph examination and does not stipulate with the defendant in writing either that the polygraph test be given or that its results would be admissible in evidence. Robinson; Perez; see Davis v. State, 520 So.2d 572, 574 (Fla. 1988).

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Camacho

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1995
661 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Camacho

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ALBERTO CAMACHO, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 25, 1995

Citations

661 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

State v. E.J.J

Polygraph results are admissible, however, upon the agreement or stipulation of the parties. Delap v. State,…