From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
May 21, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-92 (S.D. Ohio May. 21, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-92

05-21-2018

HUBERT LOWE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on February 21, 2018, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 4). On March 9, 2018, Plaintiff filed a "motion to recant" indicating his acknowledgement of the fact that his claims are time barred and his desire to withdraw his claims.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the then-pending filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 5/21/18

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lowe v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
May 21, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-92 (S.D. Ohio May. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Lowe v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:HUBERT LOWE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-92 (S.D. Ohio May. 21, 2018)