From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. Lowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 13, 1952
279 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

February 13, 1952.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.


There is an outstanding judgment of separation between these parties providing for the wife's maintenance. Such judgment measures the husband's obligation to the wife, and she may not receive an award for temporary alimony in this action for divorce (see Schmalholz v. Schmalholz, 111 App. Div. 543). The fact that the parties had been temporarily reconciled would not alter the case in the absence of a revocation of the separation judgment pursuant to section 1165 of the Civil Practice Act (see Schatzberg v. Schatzberg, 229 App. Div. 214, appeal dismissed 255 N.Y. 635; Beeber v. Beeber, 225 App. Div. 757).

The Special Term had the power, nevertheless, to award counsel fees in the divorce action (see Schmalholz v. Schmalholz, supra). We find, however, that the sum awarded was excessive and reduce it to $2,500.

The order appealed from should be modified by striking the provisions for alimony and reducing the award for counsel fees to $2,500 and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The balance of the appeal is dismissed. Settle order.

Dore, J.P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously modified by striking the provisions for alimony and reducing the award for counsel fees to $2,500 and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The balance of the appeal is dismissed. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Lowe v. Lowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 13, 1952
279 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Lowe v. Lowe

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE M. LOWE, Respondent, v. EDWIN S. LOWE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Sterlace v. Sterlace

There is no precedent, however, for defendant's assertion that the principle should be applied to an award…

Matter of Zacarolli v. Zacarolli

Under section 438 FCT of the Family Court Act, the court may allow counsel fees at any stage of the…