Opinion
Civil 1:23-CV-01711
03-29-2024
ORDER
Jennifer P. Wilson Judge
Before the court is the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson recommending that the court dismiss the amended complaint filed by Plaintiff for failure to meet the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. (Doc. 6.) No party has filed objections to the report and recommendation, resulting in the forfeiture of de novo review by this court. Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)).
Following an independent review of the report and record, and affording “reasoned consideration” to the uncontested portions of the report, EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at 879), to “satisfy [the court] that there is no clear error on the face of the record,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, the court finds that Judge Carlson's analysis is well-reasoned and fully supported by the record and applicable law.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1) The report and recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. (Doc. 6.)
2) Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing an amended complaint within 30 days of this order. (Doc. 1.)
3) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.