Our not doing so was an indication to the trial court that we could not and that we expected the trial court on remand to take any additional evidence that it believed was necessary for a final determination. See Widmer et ux v. Leffelman, 196 Or. 401, 406, 249 P.2d 476 (1952); Oliver v. Skinner and Lodge, 190 Or. 423, 455, 226 P.2d 507 (1951); Lowe v. Harmon, 179 Or. 311, 169 P.2d 887 (1946). The trial court erred when it held that it had no discretion to take new evidence.