From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lovisa Construction Co. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1987
505 N.E.2d 951 (N.Y. 1987)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 1987

Decided February 12, 1987

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Elliott Wilk, J.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Barry P. Schwartz and Fay Leoussis of counsel), for appellant.

Michael P. Goldsmith, Gary M. Axenfeld and Stephen M. Harnik for Lovisa Construction Co., Inc., respondent.

Tony Berman for Sarcon Construction Corp., respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division in Naclerio Contr. Co. v City of New York ( 116 A.D.2d 463, affd 69 N.Y.2d 794 [decided herewith]) and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Lovisa Construction Co. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1987
505 N.E.2d 951 (N.Y. 1987)
Case details for

Lovisa Construction Co. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LOVISA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 12, 1987

Citations

505 N.E.2d 951 (N.Y. 1987)
505 N.E.2d 951
513 N.Y.S.2d 386

Citing Cases

Grow Tunneling Corp. v. City of New York

The City of New York (City) urges that article 32 of its standard-form construction contract contains an…

Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New York

Yet, such distinctions hardly provide a rationale for precluding municipalities from entering into contracts…