From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lovin v. McCollum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 18, 2015
No. CIV 14-384-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 18, 2015)

Opinion

No. CIV 14-384-RAW-KEW

08-18-2015

GLEN HUGHIE LOVIN, JR., Petitioner, v. TRACY McCOLLUM, Warden, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Petitioner has filed a motion requesting the court to appoint counsel. He bears the burden of convincing the court that his claim has sufficient merit to warrant appointment of counsel. McCarthy v. Weinberg, 753 F.2d 836, 838 (10th Cir. 1985) (citing United States v. Masters, 484 F.2d 1251, 1253 (10th Cir. 1973)). The court has carefully reviewed the merits of petitioner's claim, the nature of factual issues raised in his allegations, and his ability to investigate crucial facts. McCarthy, 753 F.2d at 838 (citing Maclin v. Freake, 650 F.2d 885, 887-88 (7th Cir. 1981)). After considering petitioner's ability to present his claims and the complexity of the legal issues raised by the claims, the court finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted. See Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 996 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Rucks v. Boergermann, 57 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 1995).

ACCORDINGLY, petitioner's motion (Docket No. 13) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August 2015.

/s/ _________

RONALD A. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lovin v. McCollum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 18, 2015
No. CIV 14-384-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Lovin v. McCollum

Case Details

Full title:GLEN HUGHIE LOVIN, JR., Petitioner, v. TRACY McCOLLUM, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Aug 18, 2015

Citations

No. CIV 14-384-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 18, 2015)