From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loverde v. Consumers Petroleum Company

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Nov 6, 1945
327 Ill. App. 210 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,807. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed November 6, 1945 Released for publication November 20, 1945

NEGLIGENCE, § 117instruction assuming controverted fact as prejudicial. In action to recover damages for defendant's alleged negligence in delivering oil, where plaintiff contended that trial court erred in giving defendant's instruction which stated in substance that defendant could not be held liable for any act of negligence not committed by defendant's agent, and if damage was caused by some third party who was not agent of defendant, it should be found not guilty, held that such instruction was prejudicial for reason that although it was controverted question of fact for jury to determine as to whether or not there was third party in basement when fire started, such instruction assumed not only that there was, but that he lighted match that caused fire.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. LAWRENCE E. STONE, Judge, presiding.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the October term, 1943.

Julius S. Neale and Frank M. Kelly, for appellants;

Walter E. Moss, of counsel;

Andrew J. Farrell, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed November 6, 1945; released for publication November 20, 1945.


Summaries of

Loverde v. Consumers Petroleum Company

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Nov 6, 1945
327 Ill. App. 210 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
Case details for

Loverde v. Consumers Petroleum Company

Case Details

Full title:George Loverde and Vito Loverde, Appellants, v. Consumers Petroleum…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Nov 6, 1945

Citations

327 Ill. App. 210 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
63 N.E.2d 673

Citing Cases

Cohn v. Petroleum Heat Power Co.

The duty of an oil company and its agents in the delivery of oil is to use ordinary care and they are bound…