Opinion
March, 1910.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Burr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented upon the ground that the contract was one for the sale of goods.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Loveland v. Hess
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Summaries of
Loveland v. Hess
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for
Loveland v. Hess
Case Details
Full title:Theodore O. Loveland and James L. Records, Appellants, v. John Hess…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1910
Citations
137 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
121 N.Y.S. 1138