From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loveland v. Appliance Servs. of Lee Cnty., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Oct 14, 2015
Case No: 2:15-cv-330-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 2:15-cv-330-FtM-38MRM

10-14-2015

JOSEPH LOVELAND, Plaintiff, v. APPLIANCE SERVICES OF LEE COUNTY, INC., SAMUEL A. JOINER and KIMBERLEY JOINER, Defendants.


ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

Plaintiff brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act for unpaid overtime wage compensation, liquated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs. (Doc. #1). The parties now inform the Court that Plaintiff's claim against Defendants has been resolved in full without compromise. (Doc. #19). That said, there is no need for the Court to review and approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); King v. My Online Neighborhood, Inc., No. 6:06-cv-435-Orl-22JGG, 2007 WL 737575, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2007) ("Where the employer offers the plaintiff full compensation on his FLSA claim, no compromise is involved and judicial approval is not required." (citation omitted)).

In addition, Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Here, the parties dismiss this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and provide the Court with a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal signed by all parties. (Doc. #19). This case is therefore dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, this 14th day of October, 2015.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Loveland v. Appliance Servs. of Lee Cnty., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Oct 14, 2015
Case No: 2:15-cv-330-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Loveland v. Appliance Servs. of Lee Cnty., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LOVELAND, Plaintiff, v. APPLIANCE SERVICES OF LEE COUNTY, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2015

Citations

Case No: 2:15-cv-330-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2015)