From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lovelace v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1915
149 P. 1144 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4632

Opinion Filed June 8, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Bleakmore, C.)

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge.

Action by Mrs. Serena Wilson against B. M. Lovelace. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Stuart, Cruce Gilbert, for plaintiff in error.

Giddings Giddings, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on December 9, 1912; neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Lovelace v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1915
149 P. 1144 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Lovelace v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:LOVELACE v. WILSON

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 8, 1915

Citations

149 P. 1144 (Okla. 1915)
149 P. 1144