From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. Nevada

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 5, 2023
2:23-cv-00484-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00484-APG-DJA

07-05-2023

WILSON EARL LOVE, Plaintiff v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Defendant


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

[ECF NO. 4]

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 14, 2023, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Wilson Love's case because he failed to pay the filing fee or apply for in forma pauperis status. ECF No. 4. Love did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts' report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.


Summaries of

Love v. Nevada

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 5, 2023
2:23-cv-00484-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Love v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:WILSON EARL LOVE, Plaintiff v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 5, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00484-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2023)