From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. Love

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 29, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, as a matter of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof which directed the defendant to pay maintenance to the plaintiff for a period of eight years in the stated amounts and substituting therefor a provision directing the defendant to pay maintenance to the plaintiff for a period of five years: $4,200 per month for four years commencing July 1, 1997, and ending June 30, 2001, and $4,000 per month for one year commencing July 1, 2001, and ending June 30, 2002; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, Without costs or disbursements.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the amount of the monthly maintenance award was supported by the evidence but the eight-year duration of the award was excessive. The plaintiff is 43 years old, has three years of college education, has many years of experience as a bookkeeper, enjoys good health, and has no child-care responsibilities since the defendant was awarded custody of the parties' son. Maintenance payments for a period of five years will be adequate to give the plaintiff a reasonable period of time as well as an incentive to obtain employment or training and become self-supporting ( see, Timperio v. Timperio, 232 A.D.2d 857; Ingram v. Ingram, 208 A.D.2d 593; Parris v. Parris, 136 A.D.2d 685).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Love v. Love

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Love v. Love

Case Details

Full title:JEANNE LOVE, Respondent, v. GERARD J. LOVE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 208

Citing Cases

T.F. v. N.F.

In light of the parties' ages, their lifestyle during the marriage, their respective financial circumstances…

Palestra v. Palestra

Further, although she presently receives Social Security disability benefits, there was overwhelming evidence…