From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. Hassan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
19-cv-01871-JD (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)

Opinion

19-cv-01871-JD

07-27-2021

SAMUEL LOVE, Plaintiff, v. MOGEEB M. HASSAN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 62

JAMES DONATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim filed a report recommending dismissal of this case for plaintiffs failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 162. No. objections have been filed in response to the report, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

As the report demonstrates, plaintiff did not move his case forward despite multiple admonishments, orders to show cause, and monetary sanctions issued by the magistrate judge. Defendant has not made an appearance in this action. Consequently, the Court adopts the report and recommendation in full, and exercises its “inherent power” to dismiss the case with prejudice for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1996).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Love v. Hassan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
19-cv-01871-JD (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Love v. Hassan

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LOVE, Plaintiff, v. MOGEEB M. HASSAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 27, 2021

Citations

19-cv-01871-JD (N.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)