From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. Frontier Insurance Company

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
May 13, 2008
No. 07 C 5714 (N.D. Ill. May. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07 C 5714.

May 13, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Counsel for plaintiff Lakisha Love ("Love"), as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Yolanda Price, deceased, and as assignee of Leopoldo Jurado, M.D., has mounted an extraordinarily powerful response to the Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 12(c) motion to dismiss that has been advanced by Frontier Insurance Company ("Frontier"). It would be an act of supererogation simply to repeat Love's grounds for the denial of the Rule 12(c) motion, and this Court will not (as it need not) do so. Instead it elects to carry out its "virtually unflagging obligation to exercise its jurisdiction (see, e.g., Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706, 716 (1996), quoting that seminal Colorado River language and doctrine), in preference to relegating Love to the doubtful "remedy" that has perhaps been volunteered by Frontier's "consent" to modify the existing Rehabilitation Order in its New York forum.

In short, then, Frontier's motion is denied. At the next scheduled status hearing at 9 a.m. May 22, counsel for the parties will be expected to discuss going forward with appropriate expedition on the merits of this action.


Summaries of

Love v. Frontier Insurance Company

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
May 13, 2008
No. 07 C 5714 (N.D. Ill. May. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Love v. Frontier Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:LAKISHA LOVE, etc., Plaintiff, v. FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

No. 07 C 5714 (N.D. Ill. May. 13, 2008)