From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. Daniel

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 1, 1972
454 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1410.

March 1, 1972.

Joe H. Little, Jr., Mobile, Ala. (court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., of Ala., J. Victor Price, Jr., State of Alabama, Montgomery, Ala., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama; Daniel Holcombe Thomas, Judge.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.


Appellant, a state prisoner serving a life sentence for first degree murder, here claims that the District Court erred in denying his petition for habeas corpus. We need not — and we do not — go further, however, than the question of whether or not the Court erred by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We have determined that under the dictates of Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963), the allegations raised by the petition are such as to necessitate a hearing. The order denying Appellant's petition for habeas corpus is therefore vacated and the case is remanded for a full hearing on the merits.

Vacated and remanded.


Summaries of

Love v. Daniel

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 1, 1972
454 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Love v. Daniel

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JAMES VASSEL LOVE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. MURRY DANIEL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 1972

Citations

454 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Gulley v. Wisdom

Deposits lawfully made in a bank thus commissioned create the relation of debtor and creditor, and the public…