From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love-El v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 19, 2008
245 S.W.3d 924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 89892.

February 19, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Mark D. Seigel, Judge.

Scott Thompson, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cory Lee Atkins, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.



ORDER


Movant, Jimmy Love-El, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel coerced him into entering his guilty plea.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Love-El v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 19, 2008
245 S.W.3d 924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Love-El v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jimmy LOVE-EL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Feb 19, 2008

Citations

245 S.W.3d 924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)