From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lovato v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 14, 2001
Civil Action No. 00-M-2584 (D. Colo. Jun. 14, 2001)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 00-M-2584.

June 14, 2001


ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDERS


Pursuant to the hearing held today on the plaintiff's objections to the orders of Magistrate Judge Shaffer, dated May 4, 2001, and entered on the record on May 7, 2001, and for the reasons stated by the court at the hearing, it is

ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's orders resulted from an error of law in denying the existence of a physician-patient privilege. The privilege is recognized and the scope of the privilege is identical with C.R.S. § 13-90-107(1)(d). The privilege has been waived for the claims in this case. Under the circumstances of this case, the inquiry of plaintiff's physicians will be limited to the taking of their depositions and the plaintiff shall execute medical releases to permit such depositions.


Summaries of

Lovato v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 14, 2001
Civil Action No. 00-M-2584 (D. Colo. Jun. 14, 2001)
Case details for

Lovato v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN LOVATO, Plaintiff, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jun 14, 2001

Citations

Civil Action No. 00-M-2584 (D. Colo. Jun. 14, 2001)

Citing Cases

Atteberry v. Longmont United Hospital

See Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 602 n. 28 (1977) (noting that the "physician-patient privilege is unknown to…