From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lounsbury v. Darr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00362-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00362-DME-BNB

07-03-2012

KARA L. LOUNSBURY, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS DARR, et al. Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION TO DENY

MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

This matter comes before the Court on the magistrate judge's Recommendation (Doc. 34) to deny Plaintiff Kara Lounsbury's motion to amend her complaint as it pertains to her claim alleging denial of access to the courts (Doc. 12). No party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. Reviewing, therefore, only for clear error on the face of the record, the Court discerns no such error. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and DENIES Lounsbury's motion to amend her complaint in this regard.

BY THE COURT:

David M. Ebel

U. S. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lounsbury v. Darr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00362-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Lounsbury v. Darr

Case Details

Full title:KARA L. LOUNSBURY, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS DARR, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00362-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 3, 2012)