From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 10, 1926
108 So. 616 (Ala. 1926)

Opinion

3 Div. 759.

May 20, 1926. Rehearing Denied June 10, 1926.

C. P. McIntyre, of Montgomery, for petitioner.

Weil, Stakely Vardaman and S. H. Dent, all of Montgomery, opposed.


Petition of the Louisville Nashville Railroad Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Louisville N. R. R. Co. v. Frizzle, 108 So. 615.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 10, 1926
108 So. 616 (Ala. 1926)
Case details for

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle

Case Details

Full title:LOUISVILLE N. R. CO. v. Cecil FRIZZLE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 10, 1926

Citations

108 So. 616 (Ala. 1926)
214 Ala. 688

Citing Cases

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle

Affirmed. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle, 214 Ala. 688, 108 So. 616.…

Leo Lococo's Sons v. Louisville N. R. Co.

It undertook that burden and introduced the records pertaining to this shipment by the custodian, who was…