Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Newport Classic Homes, L.P.

3 Citing cases

  1. Eades v. Doe

    No. 04-22-00472-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 29, 2023)

    , we must uphold the trial court's decision on any appropriate legal theory urged below. See Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Newport Classic Homes, L.P., No. 05-21-00330-CV, 2023 WL 3000579, at *3 (Tex. App.-Dallas Apr. 19, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.)

  2. Carpenter v. Brackish Dev.

    No. 05-22-00802-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 8, 2023)

    Because we conclude that Brackish did not substantially invoke the litigation process, we need not consider the prejudice prong. See La.-Pac. Corp. v. Newport Classic Homes, L.P., No. 05-21-00330-CV, 2023 WL 3000579, at *6 (Tex. App.-Dallas Apr. 19, 2023, no pet.) ("Because appellees failed to establish that appellants substantially invoked the judicial process, we need not consider whether a party is required to establish prejudice[.]")

  3. Strucsure Home Warranty, LLC v. 2rh Bros. Props.

    No. 05-22-01214-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 17, 2023)

    See Holt Atherton Indus., Inc. v. Heine, 835 S.W.2d 80, 83 (Tex. 1992). Because the trial court did not issue findings of fact or conclusions of law to explain its denial of the motion to compel arbitration, we must uphold the trial court's decision on any appropriate legal theory urged below. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Newport Classic Homes, L.P., No. 05-21-00330-CV, 2023 WL 3000579, at *3 (Tex. App.-Dallas Apr. 19, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.).