From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Bella v. Di Bella

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1979
392 N.E.2d 564 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued April 24, 1979

Decided May 31, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ABRAHAM J. GELLINOFF, J.

Michael M. Platzman and Louis Noah Forman for appellant.

Murray Ramson for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division. In addition, plaintiff's constitutional challenge to the statute on equal protection grounds, having been raised for the first time on this appeal, is not entitled to be reviewed by us. It has long been the settled rule that, unless a constitutional argument is properly raised for decision below, it will not be considered in this court (see National Organization for Women v State Div. of Human Rights, 32 N.Y.2d 940; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 162, pp 630-631; § 169, p 641).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Di Bella v. Di Bella

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1979
392 N.E.2d 564 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Di Bella v. Di Bella

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS DI BELLA, Appellant, v. MARIA L. DI BELLA, Also Known as MARIA L…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1979

Citations

392 N.E.2d 564 (N.Y. 1979)
392 N.E.2d 564
418 N.Y.S.2d 577

Citing Cases

Tumolillo v. Tumolillo

While we are told that it was raised by the husband in the Appellate Division, no notice thereof was then…

Terwilliger v. Terwilliger

At issue is whether that statutory section still has life in it, and, if so, whether it is applicable here.…