From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Louis A. Grant, Inc. v. Hurricane Equipment, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 2, 2008
2:07cv438, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Apr. 2, 2008)

Opinion

2:07cv438, Electronic Filing.

April 2, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On April 19, 2007, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate's Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 626(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On February 14, 2008, the magistrate judge issued a Report (Document No. 34) recommending that Defendant Hurricane's Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 27) be granted, to the extent described in the Report.

Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and neither party filed objections.

AND NOW, on this 2th day of April, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant Hurricane's Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 27) is GRANTED to the extent described in the magistrate judge's Report, which is adopted as the opinion of the District Court.


Summaries of

Louis A. Grant, Inc. v. Hurricane Equipment, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 2, 2008
2:07cv438, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Apr. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Louis A. Grant, Inc. v. Hurricane Equipment, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS A. GRANT, INC., Plaintiff, v. HURRICANE EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 2, 2008

Citations

2:07cv438, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Apr. 2, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wisconsin v. Indivior Inc. (In re Suboxone Antitrust Litig.)

Proper establishment of specific jurisdiction under the Due Process Clause requires satisfaction of a…

United Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

For the exercise of specific jurisdiction to comply with the Due Process Clause, a plaintiff must satisfy a…