From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Louie v. Asset Capital Recovery Group, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 26, 2015
3:15-CV-01680-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2015)

Opinion

         

          EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

         TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

         WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, defendants Asset Capital Recovery Group, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, (hereinafter, "ACRG"), the Law Offices of Kenosian & Miele, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, (hereinafter, "K&M"), and Kenneth John Miele, an individual, (hereinafter, "Mr. Miele") (Asset Capital, Kenosian & Miele and Mr. Miele shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as "Defendants") filed their First Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 13) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for a dismissal of the Complaint (dkt. 1) filed by plaintiff Steven C. Louie, an individual (hereinafter, "Plaintiff") on April 13, 2015 (Defendants and Plaintiff shall hereinafter each be collectively referred to as the "Parties");

         WHEREAS, the Court originally set Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition brief to Defendants' First Motion to Dismiss as June 24, 2015, and set Defendants' deadline to file a Reply brief in support of the First Motion to Dismiss as July 1, 2015;

         WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, Defendants filed a Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge (dkt. 12);

         WHEREAS, on June 12, 2015, the Court thus entered an Oder (dkt. 16) reassigning this case for all further proceedings to the Honorable Judge Edward M. Chen;

         WHEREAS, as a result of the Court's June 12, 2015 Order (dkt. 16), Defendants re-noticed the hearing date for their First Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 13), and scheduled the hearing date as July 23, 2015 (dkt. 17);

         WHEREAS, the Court consequently set Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition brief to Defendants' First Motion to Dismiss as June 26, 2015, yet left Defendants' deadline to file a Reply brief in support of the First Motion to Dismiss as July 1, 2015;

          SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN, LAW OFFICES OF SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN, P.C., Beverly Hills, California Attorney for Defendants: ASSET CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUP, LLC, LAW OFFICES OF KENOSIAN & MIELE, LLP, AND KENNETH JOHN MIELE.

          James A. Michel Attorney for Plaintiff: Steven C. Louie.

          AND WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants is traveling throughout the entire week of June 29, 2015, and is not scheduled to return until July 5, 2015;


         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties that Defendants' deadline to file a Reply brief in support of Defendants' First Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 13) shall be continued from July 1, 2015 to and including July 6, 2015.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3):

         Concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

         GRANTED.


Summaries of

Louie v. Asset Capital Recovery Group, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 26, 2015
3:15-CV-01680-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Louie v. Asset Capital Recovery Group, LLC

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN C. LOUIE, Plaintiff, v. ASSET CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUP, LLC, LAW…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 26, 2015

Citations

3:15-CV-01680-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2015)