From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loughlin v. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co. of Brooklyn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1911
94 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1911

Decided February 21, 1911

William A. Jones, Jr., for appellant.

Oswald N. Jacoby and Nathaniel A. Elsberg for respondent.


Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of BURR, J., below.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, WERNER and COLLIN, JJ. Dissenting: VANN and HISCOCK, JJ.


Summaries of

Loughlin v. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co. of Brooklyn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1911
94 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Loughlin v. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co. of Brooklyn

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH C. LOUGHLIN, as Administratrix of the Estate of DANIEL F…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 21, 1911

Citations

94 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1911)
201 N.Y. 530