Plaintiff has failed to allege the existence of a condition posing an unreasonable risk of harm on Defendant's premises. The Supreme Court of Texas has held that because naturally accumulated ice "results from precipitation beyond a premises owner's control," and invitees "are at least as aware as landowners of the existence of [ice] that has accumulated naturally outdoors and will often be in a better position to take immediate precautions against injury," naturally accumulated ice on a defendant's premises does not pose an unreasonable risk of harm to invitees. Id. at 412, 414; see also Lough v. Pack, 2013 WL 1149524, at *2 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2013, no pet.) ("[N]aturally occurring ice does not present an unreasonable risk of harm unless there is assistance or involvement of unnatural contact."
The "naturally occurring" rule has been limited to outdoor accumulations without human intervention. See, e.g., Callahan v. Vitesse Aviation Servs., 397 S.W.3d 342, 352-54 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013, no pet.) (applying Scott & White when plaintiff slipped on ice while walking outdoors); Lough v. Pack, No. 02-12-00336-CV, 2013 WL 1149524, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 21, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (applying Scott & White when plaintiff slipped on porch). This case involves rainwater, not ice or snow, on an indoor concrete floor treated with a shiny sealant.